🔗 Share this article

Russia's monetary authority has stated it is pursuing compensation valued at $230 billion against the securities depository Euroclear. This move is a clear warning from the Kremlin regarding proposals to use frozen Russian sovereign funds to support Ukraine.

The Substantial Demand

Based on accounts in Russian state media, the monetary authority filed a claim last week for an estimated 18 trillion roubles. This figure corresponds to the stated $230 billion demand.

European Union officials will decide later this week on a proposal to use approximately €210 billion in frozen Russian assets. The proposal involves providing Ukraine with a large loan to finance its defence and economic stability.

The vast majority of these funds, totaling €185 billion, are stored at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. Euroclear acts as the primary keeper for the Russian immobilised sovereign wealth.

Dispute on Ownership

EU authorities have argued that their proposal is legally sound. They argue is based on the fact that ownership of the sovereign wealth remains with Russia, even though it was immobilized in EU jurisdictions shortly after the full-scale military offensive of Ukraine.

Moscow, however, has labeled any use of the assets as illegal appropriation. Authorities have warned of retaliatory measures, such as seizing European private investors' holdings within Russia.

Kirill Dmitriev, who has taken on a prominent role in peace negotiations, wrote on a social media platform that Russia "will prevail in court" and regain its assets. He added that the EU, the euro, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the proposal.

Wider Implications

In comments interpreted as an effort to create division between Europe and the United States, the official characterized the assets plan as "a severe attack on property rights and the international reserves system established by the United States."

The clearing house refused to comment on the latest legal action. The institution has previously noted it is contending with more than 100 legal cases in Russian courts.

Enforcement Challenges

Although judges in EU countries are not expected to recognize rulings from Russian courts, experts expect Moscow to seek enforcement in nations with closer relations to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities could try to enforce a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly states, if such holdings can be located," stated a legal expert from an international firm.

EU Countermeasures

EU officials indicated they are working on steps to discourage other nations from assisting any Russian legal action against European companies. Additionally, they are designing protections to protect EU countries with investments in Russia from what they call "unlawful expropriation."

How the Funding Would Work

According to the complex plan, the EU would issue an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the proceeds generated from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's ownership claim on the principal funds would remain unaffected.

Ukraine would solely be required to repay the money in the event that Russia consented to pay reparations for the vast destruction caused during the ongoing conflict.

Alternative Proposals

The Belgian government, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to examine an alternative approach for funding Ukraine. This involves joint EU borrowing to secure a loan, backed by unallocated funds within the EU budget.

This alternative move, however, demands full agreement among all 27 member states. The Hungarian government, viewed as friendly with the Kremlin, has previously signaled its objection.

Commenting on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas, described the reparations loan as "the strongest solution" for aiding Ukraine. "The reparations loan is secured against the Russian immobilized funds, which means it doesn't come from our taxpayers' money, which is also important," she stated. "Furthermore, it sends a powerful signal that when you cause all this destruction to another country, you must pay for the reparations."