🔗 Share this article

The beluga known as Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie Botts is an charming small “ham sandwich”. The whale Orion – nicknamed “Onion Ring” – is a large but fiercely protective friend. Zephyr has “ants in his pants” and sways like a worm. Lillooet is the “most affectionate” with a heart of gold.

Thirty enclosed beluga whales in a Canadian entertainment facility have become pawns in a struggle between a defunct facility, public officials and advocacy groups.

But those closest to the whales say the intense debate over their fate often ignores the nuances of the whales who, after spending their lives in confinement, have been closely studied by the people who interact with them daily.

After the Canadian government prevented the transfer of the belugas to China, the controversial attraction near the famous falls where they are held threatened to put them down unless the federal government pays for the cost of their survival. The nation’s fisheries minister has refused that request, placing the 30 whales in an increasingly precarious circumstance.

Highly Cognitive Marine Mammals

Researchers say that belugas’ neural makeup, along with their mimicry abilities, intellectual tasks and group interactions point to they are remarkably smart mammals – something one caretaker discovered first-hand.

Burgess spent a significant period as a marine mammal specialist, a job that entailed building relationships of the marine predators.

“Developing those connections over time takes a lot of consistency and a lot of care. At the outset, they’re very unsure of you,” she said. “In time, you gain mutual trust. And they start being more vulnerable with you. It’s just so extraordinary and rewarding.”

The trainer knew the whales were highly intelligent, but she says she was nevertheless astounded by the nuances and unique traits in their personalities. She developed a particular love for a pair of whales with contrasting temperaments.

“Eve accepted me. The other required effort,” she said. “Each transformed the way I perceive connection.”

Growing Opposition and Facility Decline

Burgess’s interaction with the whales developed against a backdrop of rising activist criticism to their enclosure.

During her tenure at the attraction, seven belugas and the park’s single orca, the orca, succumbed. In total, 19 belugas have perished at the park since recent years, a toll which the facility links to natural mortality, but which advocates say indicates the substandard environment in which they were kept.

The park did not admit visitors to the visitors over the recent season, but the former trainer says she saw with her own eyes effects of the cessation. “Concrete is deteriorating from the pools because they’re in disrepair and not being repaired. The whales are exploratory and so they grab fragments and move about with fragments in their jaws. It’s heartbreaking to see.”

The park did not comment to a inquiry, but earlier asserted: “The whales … get far superior medical attention and 24/7 care than any human in the Britain, or anywhere else.”

Fate in Limbo and Proposed Solutions

The former employee was terminated from the park in recent months following the death of a beluga, an unwell beluga the park staff had to put down. She said the park believed particulars of the incident were disclosed to the media and she was fired not long after.

The ambiguity over the whales’ outcome has left Burgess and staff members in distress. She says the park’s ultimatum to kill its whales is a leverage tool and is a “practically unfeasible” undertaking, adding any attempts to humanely kill even a single beluga would require “immense manpower”, equipment and machinery.

“It cannot happen in hell the caretakers would ever do it,” she said.

Burgess supports calls for the whales to be transferred right away from the facility, with its failing enclosures and dwindling staff.

In the autumn, Canada’s government official rejected a bid to export the whales to an overseas location.

“Allowing the application would have meant a ongoing situation in captivity and a return to performance for audiences,” the official commented. “As the public, we know that marine mammals should be in the wild, not in tanks for our enjoyment. I could not in ethical standing approve an relocation that would continue the conditions these belugas have endured.”

But Burgess said the official’s comments indicate a wider incorrect perception of the realities of living conditions for belugas raised in confinement.

“The people needs to understand these are whales that have lived entirely in captivity and they will need ongoing assistance for the rest of their years,” she said. “Many just don’t comprehend that it’s not as easy as saying ‘end operations’.”

Alternative Habitat and Ongoing Debate

As decision makers attempt to find a resolution, suggestions have emerged, some of which have questionable practicality. One proposal called for the belugas to be let go into the open waters of the Arctic – where whales are a important part of sustenance for Inuit communities.

A suggested refuge in the region of Nova Scotia, which recently received official endorsement, has proven most controversial. The future location, which includes extensive space of protected cove, remains undeveloped. Advocates remain positive that it could in time represent a long term answer for some of the whales.

But, Burgess says, among trainers she’s discussed with, there is “skepticism there” about what she said is “simply an trial” in the whales’ fate.

Different voices say the possibility of a protected habitat reflects a broader global shift away from zoos and aquariums and could represent a workable plan in the near future.

The project lead, head of the initiative, said the location will simulate the cognitive activities and feeding regimen the whales obtain from caretakers, albeit in a much larger space. He said after the well-being of whales is thoroughly evaluated, which could take months|an extended period|